Liberal dating a libertarian today

5 Ways to Turn a Liberal Into a Conservative (At Least Until the Hangover Sets In) - The Crux

liberal dating a libertarian today

"I really call myself a classical liberal more than a conservative. The “classical liberal” label has until now mostly been the domain of libertarian we understand it today, also featured the most prominent use to its date of the. In one study, for instance, liberal and conservative subjects were asked . liberalism to conservatism to libertarianism now that I have become Even his name says “I'm an angry punk teenager who can't get a girlfriend”. The reason libertarians and classical liberals exercise some degree of The challenges we face now are not the same as they were in the.

Liberal thinks need to go beyound the selfish instinct. Discover has officially reached a new low. The title of the article and comments 2, 3, and 4 especially 2 are hateful and unsupportable and almost silly comments.

Where are your snide comments about them. No more brain-addling jokes, either. Many hand sanitizers contain some very toxic chemicals that can, in fact, affect the brain, at least temporarily.

More sensitive people can experience effects such as short term memory loss, confusion, and mood changes from relatively minor toxic exposures.

liberal dating a libertarian today

It would be interesting to repeat this part of the study and measure for some of these other possible effects as well to determine whether or not the chemical itself might be the cause of the tempoary shift in ideology.

Hmm, could there be a connection between our increasingly polluted environment and more toxic consumer products anti-bacterial, stain-resistant, UV-protected, …you name it and an increasingly conservative and irrational political climate?

liberal dating a libertarian today

Food for thought, and further research. AnneV Contrary to what JMW is postulating, my mother and I are at opposite ends of the baby-boomer generation and we are both skewing more liberal over time, not less. Most of our friends seem to be doing the same, responding to threats to defund PP, education, and food stamps, among other concerns. BP I have to say, that makes a lot of sense to me.

For instance, a lot of people who are deeply religious will be lumped into the conservative camp, but so will those that are hyper-capatilists. Matt So are there circumstances that cause conservatives to make liberal statements? RM But what about Uncle Elmer? Why bring up long-term changes and then change the subject. Long-term ideological changes surely have more of an impact than short term ones. Why, then, are they less interesting?

When I started to pay attention, and thus became educated on what was happening, I could not logically hold together the beliefs that those on the Left kept maintaining. They were contradictory, illogical, inflammatory, accusatory, and generally off-ball nuts.

I started looking at ALL the arguments, from both sides, and found that those that were giving cogent, reasoned, factual-based opinions were on the Right. I see them as frat boys that throw a flaming bag of dog doo on the porch and congratulating themselves on how clever they are at thinking up something new and executing it flawlessly. By nature we are supposed to take care of ourselves and our family first.

It seems that the right-leaning responses arise from our instinctual tendencies to be selfish. Our instincts define who we are and ultimately how we think, so it would appear that everyone, at their core, is a conservative. I personally cannot speak for the entire republican party but can i can speak for some of its principles; not the social nonsensical principles but rather the ideologies that actually matter like government and the economy.

Again I cannot speak for the entire republican party as there are a fair amount of nutcases that support republican philosophy just as there are on the left. The well known Shock Agenda strategy comes to mind… if you can keep most people frightened and shocky in such a manner as to decrease their normal trust in normal channels of discourse, analysis and decision-making, you can get them to sign off on and accept much more brazenly antisocial, industrial and political programs, including military agendas, than you could at time when people have the time and peace of mind and necessary independence of thought to wisely judge issues.

The Shock Agenda is the exact antithesis of those conditions which sustain and feed the Wisdom of Crowds phenomena studied by James Surowiecki… a significantly more democratic, scientific and egalitarian mode of processing and evaluating issues.

Decentralization — People are able to specialize and draw on local knowledge. Aggregation — Some mechanism exists for turning private judgments into a collective decision. Absence of any of these is tantamount to guaranteeing a poor decision, whether liberal, conservative, libertarian or any other persuasion.

liberal dating a libertarian today

He has written books against Republicans, so has a vested interest in finding scientific evidence for his claims. Because of this, his opinion and evidence should be heavily scrutinized.

While this blog article would be fitting on a political website an obviously left-leaning onethis has no place on a scientific site. There are far too many subjective items and terms involved here. Believe it or not, many people actually think about and debate their political beliefs, and hold these beliefs whether drunk, dirty, scared or under pressure. I find it disturbing that Discover edits their web commentary on articles for one.

Second its very easy to cite things and support whatever point you want to make. How about an English course?

Have you ever noticed the crazy things on History Channel or what have you claiming doomsdays and alien visitations all backed with citations! This is a comment section on what is clearly a pointed opinion piece. Do you only encourage liberals to read and comment on your articles? Or do you only care to read the opinions of liberals?

Love Him, Hate His Politics: How a Liberal/Conservative Romance Endures

If nothing else, I think the studies show that we need to keep ourselves as educated and informed as possible throughout our lives, as well as training ourselves to not getting distracted. As far as badnicolez comment: Why do you think so many conservatives are religious?

I find it hard to understand how the religious or tea party right can have so much faith in unproven ideals yet live happily in a relatively safe country with products and medicines provided by proven scientific research.

When I point out that healthcare is one of the leading costs in the U.

Are Australians ready to embrace libertarianism?

Never mind the fact that I believe higher teacher pay is necessary and right. I simply recognize that paying teachers more without competition will not produce better teacher performance, unless poor performers are pushed out to make room for others. Yet no portion of the article was set aside to summarize how the data was gathered, or examine weaknesses in the argument the researchers made. Nor have any of the posters inquired about the testing methodology.

It failed on the campaign to repeal section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which has become an iconic restriction on free speech. It has also repeatedly raised taxes, and been unable to drive any serious economic reform. Can the Liberal Party hold its 'broad church' of liberals and conservatives together?

This may sound excessively Pollyanna-ish, as if everything is just swell between Australian conservatives and libertarians. Much has been said almost all by commentators on the left about a political split between libertarians and classical liberals on the one side and conservatives on the other.

In the US, the fusion movement of the s and s was a deliberate project to build an alliance between these two distinct systems of political thought. The presidency of George W. Bush pushed that alliance to breaking point, and it seems the Trump administration has broken it. By contrast, Australian politics has never been large enough to maintain such divergent streams. Every Liberal prime minister has for the most part maintained a sort of centre-right middle ground that kept everyone equally disappointed and dissatisfied.

People are leaving the Liberal Party under the Turnbull government, not because it is too conservative or libertarian, but because it is too, well, nothing. Liberal achievements and libertarian growth The last quarter of the 20th century saw Australian public policy take major strides in a classical liberal direction.

It also helps that we have an enormous amount in common in every other arena; we are both professional writers, psychologically-minded, esthetic, nature-loving and close-binding. Our temperaments are both similar and complementary, and we enjoy a rare degree of mutual appreciation, lack of envy and boundless delight in each other's company. He expresses his opinions in writing or with his colleagues, not in conversation with me, and I do the same.

Over the years I have also come to know many of these colleagues -- who disagree with me as much as he does -- and count them as friends.

It stretches the mind.

We rarely fight, at least about public policy, having learned over the years never to begin sentences when discussing the headlines with "Do you really support [fill in the blank]?

It takes tact and dexterity, but doesn't marriage require these things of everybody? Doesn't every couple have profound, even fundamental, disagreements, even if they vote the same ticket at the polls? So, I'm sorry for the growing number of people who look for love only on websites segregated, like TV networks, by redness or blueness. It's really no better than a match by astrological sign, or any other external criteria, because the political beliefs people subscribe to say surprisingly little about their characters.