Photo by Benoît Prieur, CC BY-SA Edit-a-thon in . Deborah Youngs and Dr Sparky Booker of Swansea University ran the first edit-a-thon at a university in Wales. .. Recently, the dating site OkCupid added gender and sexuality options. Main · Videos; Ran prieur okcupid dating. Crusade is straightened when we slit the workplaces he rode us crusade as we crusade my platoons beyond this. Noticing Ran talk about diets, I want to pipe up about a diet I've been favorite foods on afrocolombianidad.info (I just joined it too, like Ran) - some . I have not checked , but isn't first evidence of (proto) humans plus fire dated to.
Victims were told they would be linked up with rich female clients. An example of an online ad seeking out male social escorts who are promised quick cash to have sex with sugar mummies. The police have urged the public to be wary of dubious online ads. Harry, a psychology student, told The Straits Times he searched online personal advertisements last month.
wikiwomen – Wikimedia Blog
I thought I d just take a risk, he said. On websites like Locanto and Gumtree, Harry found a sugar mummy agent who had testimonials from purported customers. Harry was told the women were married and in Singapore, and searchkng either pick him up or meet him in a hotel. He said the mummies are based in Singapore but they all go through him to find toyboys for them, Harry said, adding that after the payment was made, Razak transferred him to an admin manager.
Earlier this month, police reported a surge in online crime here which has pushed up the overall crime rate. Harry paid this sum as well, noting that dating maxon pedals for social escorts also seqrching for a similar fee. He demanded his money back and made a police report. He has not heard from the agent since.
Razak kept saying I am never going to cheat you; I will never run awaysaid Harry. Of course, I feel bad about this, because I m educated. Police are investigating the cases and have appealed for anyone with information to come forward. They urge past life soul mate relationships dating public to be wary of dubious online ads, and when corresponding with strangers online. Mr Chong Ee Jay, manager searchjng Touch Cyber Wellness, a voluntary welfare group that teaches Internet safety, said this online scam was one of the more insidious ones.
It drives up the fantasy level. They know there are risks involved but. The strange new craze among people in Wales being teetotal. Wales has a bigger share of teetotallers dqting Scotland or England. Walk through a Welsh town or city on a Friday night and it is not hard to find examples of alcohol-influenced mayhem. Do you plan on publishing your writing? It's already published right here! I'd like to make a physical book, but I want to do a thorough job: Maybe I'll eventually do it myself with a laser printer and some kind of home binding gizmo.
Meanwhile, in May ofa reader went on lulu. That link goes to the paperback, and here's the hardcover. In May ofshe put together a collection of my zines: Nobody is making money on this, not even Lulu since they take a percentage of the author's profits. Some of the texts are also available as free pdf downloads.
Why don't you submit your writing to places that will allow it to reach a wider audience? No one who understands fame wants to be famous. I like my small, smart audience. Hopefully someone will "steal" "my" ideas and go on the book tours so I don't have to.
Actually no one has asked me this, but I am, and likely to stay that way, for reasons I don't fully understand myself. Here's my OkCupid profile.
Will you housesit for me? Now that I own a house, my housesitting days are over. But I might need one some time. I thought you lived on an off-grid homestead. I do have ten primitive acres with a tiny hut and some berry bushes, but I don't spend a lot of time there.
Am searching for a sugar mummy dating
For more, check out my Landblog FAQ. Will you come speak at my class or event? I give my writing away free, because no matter how much I give away, I still have it! I'm less generous with my time.
And if I'm going to be staying the night, or in town for more than a few hours when I'm not at the event, I need a place to hang out with kitchen and internet access. These supervoters love Trump, and I think it's not because they want to own slaves -- it's because they feel beseiged by an alien culture. Although maybe, because they're in Mode 2, they assume that being a cultural minority means being a slave.
A deeper question is whether we're making moral progress. In ten thousand years will we still be flipping between the two modes, or will we be permanently and universally in Mode 1? And if we get there, where will we go next?
- Ran Prieur
I've just discovered a great internet thinker, Siderea, whose blog is called Sibylla Bostoniensis. So, mixed in with the other stuff I write about, I'll be gradually going through her history and summarizing my favorite bits here. Today, a post from January on Class in America. This stuff is all completely obvious when I think about it, but hardly anyone thinks about it, so it seems fresh and important. The big idea is that social class and economic class are different things.
Economic class is how much money you make, and social class is actually culture. It's forbidden in America to talk about social class, so people talk around it badly by talking about economic class: This rhetorical substitution of economic class for social class has a particular virtue for people in more privileged social classes: So it is okay -- preferred, even -- to discuss the difficulty of the poor to become non-poor due to lack of resources: Real problems all -- but also handy substitutes for discussing the much, much more uncomfortable topics of discrimination against job applicants and promotion candidates for having an accent, a hair-do, a sense of style, an address on one's resume that is lower-class.
Siderea goes on to cover several angles of the subject of moving from one social class to another, and this makes me think of a whole other subject: People really hate changing their culture, and lots of political issues come down to cultural standoffs, where two cultures are incompatible and neither side wants to change, like when immigrants don't want to assimilate, or when old people don't want to adopt the values of young people.
It's not always clear who's right, and sometimes the disagreements are over silly things like how to pronounce words. But it gets interesting when political and technological changes favor certain cultures. The internet helps cultures that value transparency, and undermines cultures that value secrecy.
Birth control helps cultures that value sexual freedom, and undermines cultures that want to harness sex to family obligations. I can even put my support for an unconditional basic income in cultural terms: Some stray links where I have little or nothing to add. The sugar conspiracy is a long article about how nutrition scientists got it backwards for 40 years, telling us that fat was worse than sugar, despite never having good evidence. The deeper message is that science doesn't work as well as it thinks.
Eventually the evidence wins out, but in the short term scientific truth is more a function of politics, culture, and ego. A good book on this subject is Science in Action by Bruno Latour. By guaranteeing basic survival, a government provides a service as necessary as, say, policing the streets or fighting off foreign enemies.
At the same time, once this service is provided, the government can get out of trying to regulate the labor market: Its goal of keeping people fed and clothed is already achieved. In college I was obsessed with Wuthering Heights and took four different classes that covered it. People think it's about romantic love when really it's about how modern society is a prison for the soul -- and apparently also about crappy food.
Finally, one of my favorite reddit threads ever, with hundreds of creative answers to a good question: God escorts you to a door, telling you that this is your own personal heaven. What's behind your door? I've got some good stuff in my link bin, but first I have one more thought on motivation: We have social pressure to do certain things, but no social support. Imagine you're stocking shelves at Walmart.
Everyone knows the job sucks, so the managers take care of motivation: I would call this vertical external support, and it gets the job done, but the better system is horizontal external support: At the other extreme, I think the only purely internal motivation is obsession: Even on a project that other people don't know about, your beliefs about how they will receive it can get in the way.
That's why I've been failing to write fiction, because I've been thinking about it backwards, more in terms of its public reception than what I enjoy writing moment by moment. And that's why George RR Martin can't finish the Game of Thrones books, because at first he was creating his own universe for fun, and now he's carrying the burden of the expectations of millions of people, who are giving him no help with the actual writing.
My point is, the whole world is more and more like this, and it happened accidentally through good intentions. You're no longer stuck doing the same job your parents did, but now that you're free, you're still burdened by social pressures: At best your parents will keep you from living on the streets and you'll get predictable advice from strangers on the internet.
I see two ways out of this. I mean, the thousand year solution is to build a complex society with a wide perspective and a high standard of living, where every task that holds society together is done voluntarily by healthy social groups. But right now I see two ways people are responding to this difficult world. Young people crave social collapse: Now that I'm an old person, physically weaker but mentally stronger, my solution is to not care what people think.
Give me an unconditional basic income and let me follow my unfashionable obsessions. Continuing from last week, yet another stray thought on motivation. I was watching an interview with UFC champion Miesha Tate, and she was talking about how she got obsessed with wrestling in high school. Her school didn't have a girls wrestling team, so she would wrestle the boys and always lose.
How was this motivating? Because every time she lost she learned stuff, which she applied to her next match to lose by a smaller margin. She established a rhythm -- fight, learn, adjust, fight -- with positive feedback in two places: I do the same thing when I write about music: How often does life work like this? In social behavior, when you make a mistake, you rarely find out exactly what you did wrong, and you usually don't get another chance with that same person -- unless they're a family member, and then you're just learning to match their particular dysfunction, which will not work when you're out in the world getting one chance each with people who have completely different dysfunctions.
It's a miracle that anyone ever becomes socially competent. In school, when you take a test or turn in a project, they tell you what you did wrong, but you don't get another chance -- you're stuck with that low grade for life, and then you move on to badly learning something new. You do get good feedback and multiple chances when you're being trained for a job -- but only if your trainers are good, and pretty soon you reach a plateau where you're no longer learning, just going through a routine for a paycheck.
am searching for a sugar mummy dating
I've just spent all afternoon writing and deleting drafts, trying and failing to go somewhere interesting with this idea. All I can say is that we need to set up society so that we spend our lives enjoying getting better at skills that make life better for everyone, and this is going to take a really long time. Another stray thought on motivation. Last week I wrote that nothing I've done in real life matches games for rewarding moment-to-moment action but writing can be close and someone asked me, what about the stuff I did on the land?
This illustrates a principle that you can only really understand with life experience: Building a cabin sounds wonderful, but it's such a massively complex and alien project that I just felt overwhelmed; and how-to books, with thousands of things that have to be done in just the right difficult and expensive way, only made it worse.
Growing fruit trees is something I can wrap my head around, but it's not something where you can get in the flow, and there's little connection between effort and reward: I put countless hours into trees that died, while the most successful thing I planted was a blue elder that I probably spent ten minutes on.
One thing I did up there that felt rewarding was throwing logging debris into piles. It has clear benefits, making the land more beautiful and walkable, and making habitat for critters, and every little action is clearly visible permanent progress.
Cutting lower branches off trees to open up the woods and reduce fire danger was similar. In hindsight, by writing the landblog, I was carrying readers on my shoulders so they could enjoy stuff I wasn't enjoying enough myself, and if I had it to do over again, I would do a lot more stuff that's fun to do and boring to tell other people about.
This is good life advice in general. I've been kicking around some stray thoughts about motivation. Last week, going off on a tangent while answering an email, I figured out what I mean when I accuse people of puritanism, and my metaphor is diet. Your diet is your body's business, and maybe your head can help by reading about nutritional studies, but some people have dietary restrictions that are nothing about their bodies and all about their heads: