java - How to do web scraping using htmlunitsriver? - Stack Overflow
Sep 12, Accessibility QA starts with broadening your frame of reference and understanding what it's like to use a computer in unfamiliar ways. With that. How do web conferencing programs work? Keep up to date on: Latest Buzz; Stuff Shows & Podcasts; Tours; Weird & Wacky. Sign Up Now! Newsletter Policy &. Main · Videos; Www dating doweb. Finally, whereas you're bedecked in our dispensers thru epub in general, you can skim our skim amongst epub.
Overlaying apps with phishing windows This is the most popular technology with cybercriminals and is used in practically all banking Trojans.
How to do Web Accessibility QA: Part 2 | Viget
The Marcher malware Besides this, Trojans often overlay various social media and instant messaging apps and steal the passwords to them.
The Acecard malware However, mobile banking Trojans typically target financial applications, mostly banking apps. This method was used, for example, by the Acecard family of mobile banking Trojans. Acecard phishing windows 2. Apps are overlaid with a phishing web page located on a malicious server. This way, the cybercriminals can modify its contents any time they need to.
This method is used by the Marcher family of banking Trojans. Marcher phishing page 3. A template page is downloaded from a malicious server, to which the icon and the name of the attacked application is added. This is how one of the Trojan-Banker. Faketoken modifications manages to attack over 2, financial apps.
FakeToken phishing page It should be noted that starting from Android 6, for the above attack method to work, the FakeToken Trojan has to request the privilege of displaying its window on top of other app windows. The earliest versions of the Trojan that redirected the user to a phishing page are dated late Apriland the latest are from the first half of November The Trojan subscribes to modify browser bookmarks, which includes changes in the current open page. This way the Trojan knows which webpage is currently open, and if it happens to be one of the targeted pages, the Trojan opens the corresponding phishing page in the same browser and redirects the user there.
We were able to find over a hundred web pages belonging to financial organizations that were targeted by the Marcher family of Trojans. However, two points need to be raised: All new modifications of the Marcher Trojan that we were able to detect no longer use this technology. Those modifications that used this technology also used a method of overlaying other apps with their phishing window.
Why then was the method of redirecting the user to a phishing page used by only one family of mobile banking Trojans, and why is this technology no longer used in newer modifications of the family? There are several reasons: With that understanding, we can dive into actual testing.
Do web injections exist for Android?
The older Section standard is relevant only for government sites. But good luck understanding WCAG on first glance. It's hard to make sense of WCAG's multi-layered categorization, jargon, and sheer number of items. You don't have to worry about all that to get started.
Instead, I find it easier to think in terms of these broad goals: People who don't use a mouse should be able to use and understand a site. People who don't look at a screen should be able to use and understand a site. A site's content should be visually legible.
People should have access to alternate versions of video and audio content. People should have control over automatic changes to the page. Goals 4 and 5 cover accessibility items that are less common or more likely to be out of your hands.
Here's my four-step approach for testing with those goals in mind: Use an automated testing tool as a first check. Use the site with a keyboard instead of a mouse. Use the site with a screen reader. Test specific WCAG items as needed.
The great thing about this approach is you don't have to get into the WCAG weeds. The first three steps will cover most common WCAG items without you even knowing it. Here's a testing spreadsheet template to make things easier: I usually fully test each step, then abstract my spreadsheet notes into tickets.
How do web conferencing programs work?
You can use this tab for reference once you're ready to get deeper into WCAG. It's a waste of time to test things that don't exist, unless the team is prepared to retroactively design and implement missing things. Now let's look at the four testing steps in detail.
I usually only pay attention to the general errors denoted in red and the contrast errors denoted in black. For example, this WAVE report found that some form fields did not have labels, and some linked elements — in this case, social media icons — did not have text: WAVE also generates a lot of noise. For a well-implemented site, I've found that some errors and most alerts denoted in yellow are not actual problems.
Also, if you encounter a lot of contrast errors, it might be because your designers didn't check for color contrast in the first place. After a couple projects, you'll get a feel for which errors should be addressed and which you can ignore. In this step, you aren't testing specific WCAG items so much as trying to experience the site as any keyboard user would.
Tab through at least one instance of every unique page. Even without deep WCAG knowledge, any frustrations or confusion will be obvious.